Continued ratings declines portend more turbulence
Star ratings are critical to Medicare Advantage plans, given the financial and strategic implications. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today publicly released the 2025 star ratings data for all contracts.
While health plans have been able to view their own results for the past few weeks, stakeholders across the country are now poring through the data to understand trends and implications.
We are sharing a preliminary analysis of the star ratings results and rating changes for specific plans. In the coming weeks, we will follow up with a more in-depth analysis that includes views by plan type, star ratings measure, and cut points. Our follow-up analysis will also discuss the implications for health plans.
When looking at the top 15 plans by enrollment, we see some interesting trends. Notably:
Some plans have signaled their intentions to contest their recent star ratings results. The outcomes of these challenges may affect their final ratings for the upcoming year.
Achieving 4+ stars is critical because it qualifies the health plan for the quality bonus payment (QBP) and a greater rebate percentage.1 The health plan can reinvest both into benefits that make products more attractive, driving growth and financial performance.
The table below shows how membership in the top 15 health plans (by total enrollment) has shifted into or out of tiers of stars performance. Looking beyond the average rating to the shifts in tiers reveals the true economic impact for each plan.
Overall, the market saw 18% of membership shift out of 4 and 5 star plans. Plans that saw membership shift out of these categories will experience margin pressure due to the loss in quality bonus payment (QBP). Notably, Humana, GuideWell, Elevance, and United saw the biggest shifts out of these tiers. Kaiser was the only plan to see growth in the 4+ star tier.
Humana’s rating reduction was driven by a decline from 4.5 stars to 3.5 stars in its largest contract (H5216). This contract contains 45% of Humana’s Medicare Advantage membership , including 90% of its group Medicare Advantage membership.
Despite its marginal average score increase this year, Centene members in plans below 3 stars grew by approximately 100,000. Centene’s plans below 3 stars could be at risk of termination by CMS if they stay on their current trajectory. Additionally, this rating will affect their placement in the Plan Finder and result in a low-performing plan status in the upcoming enrollment period.
While not shown in this chart, some plans’ star ratings shifted from 5.0 stars to 4.5 stars. This change results in a higher overall average star rating and financial improvement from an increased rebate. However, it does not impact their QBP.
Sources:
1 Plans that earn 4 stars receive a 5% increase in their benchmark as a quality bonus payment. Plans that score 3.5 or 4 stars receive a 65% rebate percentage. Plans that receive 4.5 or 5 stars receive a 70% rebate percentage. Moving from 4.5 to 5 stars does not provide a rebate or quality bonus payment advantage. However, plans with 5 stars have a strategic advantage of marketing their products year-round, not just during the short open enrollment period in October through December.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Advantage September 2024 Enrollment and 2025 Medicare Advantage Part C and D Star Ratings Data Tables, Chartis analysis.
Enrollment is based on September 2024 CMS enrollment and includes only health plans that had ratings in both 2024 and 2025. Star ratings are weighted by enrollment.
Our analysis bases weighted average enrollment on the most recent enrollment data available for the star rating year. Thus, our weighted average stars for previous years will not match the weighted average stars in the CMS memo.